<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Handwriting renderers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mblondel.org/journal/2008/07/13/handwriting-renderers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mblondel.org/journal/2008/07/13/handwriting-renderers/</link>
	<description>Computer science, Chinese, Japanese, random thoughts…</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rich</title>
		<link>http://www.mblondel.org/journal/2008/07/13/handwriting-renderers/#comment-179955</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mblondel.org/journal/2008/07/13/handwriting-renderers/#comment-179955</guid>
		<description>Even for Chinese characters, there are stroke order discrepancies between Taiwan and mainland China. I noticed that when I was searching stroke orders using Arch Chinese. BTW, Arch Chinese (http://www.archchinese.com) is the one I really like and it is free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even for Chinese characters, there are stroke order discrepancies between Taiwan and mainland China. I noticed that when I was searching stroke orders using Arch Chinese. BTW, Arch Chinese (http://www.archchinese.com) is the one I really like and it is free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mathieu</title>
		<link>http://www.mblondel.org/journal/2008/07/13/handwriting-renderers/#comment-94053</link>
		<dc:creator>Mathieu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 15:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mblondel.org/journal/2008/07/13/handwriting-renderers/#comment-94053</guid>
		<description>In Japanese the stroke order is correct. However, if I didn't know it, I would be tempted to write it the way you said. And it's interesting to see that the stroke order is different in Japanese and Chinese. When the handwriting database website is built, this must be taken into consideration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Japanese the stroke order is correct. However, if I didn&#8217;t know it, I would be tempted to write it the way you said. And it&#8217;s interesting to see that the stroke order is different in Japanese and Chinese. When the handwriting database website is built, this must be taken into consideration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uraka.Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.mblondel.org/journal/2008/07/13/handwriting-renderers/#comment-94029</link>
		<dc:creator>Uraka.Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 02:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mblondel.org/journal/2008/07/13/handwriting-renderers/#comment-94029</guid>
		<description>er, I think your stroke order of the character "station" in Chinese is wrong, the first stroke should be the horizontal line. in your picture, the order should be(start from 1) 2, 4, 5, 3, 1+6, ... 1+6 means that 1 and 6 is 1 stroke, not 2.

ok, this is only how we Chinese write this character, i'm not sure for Japanese.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>er, I think your stroke order of the character &#8220;station&#8221; in Chinese is wrong, the first stroke should be the horizontal line. in your picture, the order should be(start from 1) 2, 4, 5, 3, 1+6, &#8230; 1+6 means that 1 and 6 is 1 stroke, not 2.</p>
<p>ok, this is only how we Chinese write this character, i&#8217;m not sure for Japanese.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
